St. Jude Agrees to Pay $27 Million for Allegedly Selling Defective Heart Devices (2024)

St. Jude Medical Inc. (St. Jude) has agreed to pay $27 million to settle allegations under the False Claims Act that, between November 2014 and October 2016, it knowingly sold defective heart devices to health care facilities that, in turn, implanted the devices into patients insured by federal health care programs. St. Jude was acquired by Abbott Laboratories in January 2017.

“To ensure the health and safety of patients, manufacturers of implantable cardiac devices must be transparent when communicating with the government about safety issues and incidents,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “We will hold accountable those companies whose conduct violates the law and puts patients’ health at risk.”

“Medical device manufacturers have an obligation to be truthful with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the U.S. government will not pay for devices that are unsafe and risk injury or death,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Jonathan F. Lenzner for the District of Maryland. “The government contends that St. Jude knowingly caused the submission of false claims and failed to inform the FDA with critical information about prior injuries and a death which, had the FDA been made aware, would have led to a recall. The U.S. Attorney’s Office is committed to protecting Medicare and other federal health care programs from fraud, and in doing so strengthen patient safety.”

The government alleges that St. Jude failed to disclose serious adverse health events in connection with the premature depletion of the battery in certain models of its Fortify, Fortify Assura, Quadra and Unify devices, which are implantable defibrillators used in patients at risk of cardiac arrest due to an irregular heartbeat. The devices are surgically implanted into patients’ chests, and when the devices detect an irregular heartbeat, they send an electrical pulse to the heart to “shock” it back to its normal rhythm. The government alleged that, by 2013, St. Jude knew that lithium clusters formed on the batteries of the devices, causing some of the batteries to short and, in turn, suffer a premature power drain.

The government alleges that, in late 2014, St. Jude submitted a request to the FDA to approve a change to prevent lithium clusters from draining the battery and told the FDA, “no serious injury, permanent harm or deaths have been reported associated with this” issue. However, according to the government’s allegations, St. Jude was aware at that time of two reported serious injuries and one death associated with premature battery depletion (PBD) induced by lithium clusters.

St. Jude continued to distribute devices that had been manufactured without the new design. In August 2016, St. Jude contacted the FDA and informed it that the number of PBD events had increased to 729, including two deaths and 29 events associated with loss of pacing. On Oct. 10, 2016, St. Jude issued a medical advisory regarding the PBD caused by lithium cluster shorts, which FDA classified as a Class I recall. A Class I recall is where there is a reasonable probability that “violative” products “will cause serious adverse health consequences, including death.” After the recall, St. Jude no longer sold the older devices, but thousands of them had been implanted into patients between Nov. 20, 2014, and Oct. 10, 2016.

“Ensuring patient safety is our number one priority,” said Special Agent in Charge Maureen R. Dixon of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “HHS-OIG will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to investigate and hold accountable medical companies who put profits over people and ensure the integrity of the Medicare and Medicaid programs.”

“The FDA regulates medical devices to assure that patient health is protected,” said Special Agent in Charge Mark S. McCormack of the FDA Office of Criminal Investigations, Metro Washington Field Office. “Reporting information untruthfully to the agency about the safety of medical devices jeopardizes patients’ health and safety. We will continue to investigate and bring to justice those who place the public health at risk.”

“The Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) and its law enforcement partners will aggressively investigate fraud that puts the health of our military members and their families at risk,” said Special Agent in Charge Christopher W. Dillard of the DCIS Mid-Atlantic Field Office. “We hope this settlement sends a clear warning to medical corporations that choose profit over patient care.”

“The OPM OIG prioritizes the health and safety of patients above all else,” said Norbert E. Vint, Deputy Inspector General Performing the Duties of the Inspector General of the Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Inspector General (OPM-OIG). “We are grateful for today’s settlement and applaud the hard work of our Department of Justice and law enforcement partners.”

The civil settlement includes the resolution of claims brought under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act by Debbie Burke, a patient who received one of the devices that was subject to recall. The qui tam case is captioned United States ex rel. Debbie Burke v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., No. 16-cv-3611 (D. Md.).

The resolution obtained in this matter was the result of a coordinated effort between the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section; the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland; the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General and Office of General Counsel; DCIS; OPM-OIG; and the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations and Office of Chief Counsel.

This matter was handled by Trial Attorney Jonathan Gold of the Civil Division and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Thomas Corcoran and Jane Andersen of the District of Maryland.

The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

St. Jude Agrees to Pay $27 Million for Allegedly Selling Defective Heart Devices (2024)

FAQs

St. Jude Agrees to Pay $27 Million for Allegedly Selling Defective Heart Devices? ›

St. Jude Medical Inc. (St. Jude) has agreed to pay $27 million to settle allegations under the False Claims Act that, between November 2014 and October 2016, it knowingly sold defective heart devices to health care facilities that, in turn, implanted the devices into patients insured by federal health care programs.

What is the lawsuit against St. Jude's spinal cord stimulator? ›

The lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Maryland claimed that St. Jude Medical knowingly sold ICDs with battery problems between November 2014 and October 2016.

Who sued St. Jude Hospital? ›

On November 9, 2020, plaintiff Danny R. Love filed a pro se complaint against his former employer, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (“St. Jude”), alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

What happened to St. Jude Medical? ›

St. Jude was acquired by Abbott Laboratories in January 2017.

What is the cost of St Jude pacemaker? ›

Saint Jude and Biotronic prices are similar at: Rs. 1,15,000/- for single chamber MRI Safe. Rs.

What is the controversy with St Jude's Hospital? ›

Jude's Children's Hospital, founded by the late actor Danny Thomas and endorsed by numerous celebrities, has been slammed in a just-out report for its financial practices, and for using at least half of its fundraising on administrative and marketing tasks. It also accused the Memphis hospital of “hoarding” its funds.

What is the average cost of a spinal cord stimulator? ›

Spinal Cord Stimulator Costs "Quick Answers"

A: The cash pay price for a spinal cord stimulator ranges from $7,000-$10,000 depending on the practice. If your insurance or Medicare covers the procedure the portion you pay may be lower than the cash price.

What is the difference between St. Jude's and Shriners? ›

St. Jude's helps children with cancer. Shriner's help children with physical disabilities.

Did Abbott buy St. Jude's? ›

Abbott Laboratories has formally completed its $25 billion acquisition of St. Jude Medical to add a chronic pain management business and significantly bolster its cardiovascular device offerings.

Is Marlo Thomas still involved with St. Jude's hospital? ›

Jude Children's Research Hospital, Marlo proudly serves as National Outreach Director for St. Jude.

What is the average cost of a cardiac pacemaker? ›

Cost of the Device and Procedure

Because there isn't just one type of pacemaker or hospital that implants them, the cost can vary anywhere between about $20,000 and $100,000, without insurance. This range is only for the pacemaker and the hospital stay and doesn't include a heart-assist pacemaker.

Is there a recall on St Jude pacemaker? ›

In 2021 the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued 3 Class I recalls involving a subset of St Jude (Abbott) pacemakers, Boston Scientific pacemakers, and Medtronic defibrillators. All these recalls were owing to the risk of premature battery depletion (Table 1).

How much does a pacemaker cost with Medicare? ›

With Original Medicare, you will be able to receive coverage for up to 80% of the charges associated with the pacemaker, meaning you may only pay 20% out-of-pocket. That means you can pay up to $19,200 for a pacemaker. But with Plan G, this 20% is covered, and you only have to worry about your Part B deductible.

What is the most common complication of spinal cord stimulator? ›

The most common complication in the literature appears to be electrode migration. Other complications ranging in rates of occurrence include hematoma formation, infection, spinal cord injury, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak.

What can go wrong with spinal cord stimulator trial? ›

Spinal Cord Stimulator Complications

A small percentage of patients may experience: Infection, which may occur in the first 2-8 weeks. Bleeding. Device migration (i.e., the electrodes move from their original location and the stimulator doesn't block pain as effectively).

What is the best spinal cord stimulator on the market? ›

WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator System wins Best Overall Medical Device Solution award. The WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS) System (Boston Scientific) has been named Best Overall Medical Device Solution at the fifth annual MedTech Breakthrough Awards.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Duane Harber

Last Updated:

Views: 5930

Rating: 4 / 5 (71 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Duane Harber

Birthday: 1999-10-17

Address: Apt. 404 9899 Magnolia Roads, Port Royceville, ID 78186

Phone: +186911129794335

Job: Human Hospitality Planner

Hobby: Listening to music, Orienteering, Knapping, Dance, Mountain biking, Fishing, Pottery

Introduction: My name is Duane Harber, I am a modern, clever, handsome, fair, agreeable, inexpensive, beautiful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.